English democracy is a system in which the two dominant parties can outlaw parties at will, leaving the field clear for Franco or imputed political corruption. PP government and agree to challenge all Bildu lists. In a case like this I wonder: Why are the judges?
Euskadi has a population of 2 million inhabitants, and as anti-terrorist services 50,000 people are "polluted." It is curious to observe how those accused of corruption are freely in elections, but those who advocate particular ideologies are set aside for "democracy."
50,000 citizens
unable to participate as candidates even though they have no conviction. The parties law is unjust, since independence political conviction but not ideologies like Franco, comes to cases as fanciful as this one, towns where nobody can occur, and DB is the only election bid.
Suppose that once the person J. was a member of an outlawed list A. Subsequent inclusion in another list B does not affect only him, but his status of "contaminated" automatically extends to all the list B, which is the person F. If C is a third list that person F is contaminated the whole list because it is a person against whom the only thing you can say is that agreed on a list with the person J.
The voice of the "contaminated
" It's simple. I, a decade ago, was financial controller at a table for Euskal Herritarrok. There was a crime, and my work was being control the voting and counting process was legitimate. It's been a lot of years and I can not attend the election. My only crime was serious and be in a table representing a legal political choice. The fact of getting into an application contaminate the rest. And not only that! You could be right now contaminated belong to a forum where I am. "
No more manipulated electoral processes throughout Europe and misleading than those made in Euskadi. Then those same people who manipulate elections describe themselves" true democrats " .
course if the English democracy!
0 comments:
Post a Comment