Article elmundo.es, January 23, 2011. Deputy the first 50 comments to the story, without modification.
FILM candidates
Next stop: Goya
candidates at 25 º Premios Goya place bets
'we will not complain over' Álex de la Iglesia promises
M ª J. Hernández Without envelopes through speeches or hidden in pockets, Goya candidates to have first seen the faces after learning they were the ones chosen. Some nerves, yes, but which are easily digested with a group of colleagues, family film that they say
La Puerta del Sol was deployed and the red carpet, along with his co-stars, actors, directors and screenwriters scarves loosened and rubbed their hands in a winter that it is such. The heat was inside the headquarters of the Community of Madrid. Hugs and good words. And gambling, although candidates, as usual, have been unwilling too wet.
'Buried' ] clowns with bad milk [
'Sad Ballad'
'Pan Black' ] and South America all used to go over [
]), but a reality which From the Church has recognized: the assistance of public rooms for English cinema has not been as expected, after the success of the previous year. "This year our work has failed to connect as many as wanted," he said in his speech, and posed challenges to his people: "We have to make a greater effort. Many times we make mistakes, but continue trying ". And, as the director of 'Sad Ballad of a trumpet'," there is nothing to stop the machine to follow the film because that is what moves our lives. "And after a sentence so round, so interests: Who will win the Goya? Watch the video and know what goes through the minds of its protagonists. 50 " Comments
Anonymous 22.Ene.2011
# 2 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 Too bad thousands of hours of film shot and hundreds of millions of euros thrown away in the making of something called film and you will not see it or their families with rebate at the entrance or the Motan gratis.Luego soiree and between them and they are rewarded and aplauden.Mientras, which does not ask permission for this waste, the ignoramos.Titiriteralandia, continues with his shame and misery in the air .... but laugh like the eyebrow.?
Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 country into ruin and a sticker or not? They both involved in politics right now ..... not quietly As they still receive millions to make messes of films .... In twenty only one half decent. I do not care who wins. Spain has the worst kind polítiuca the world and even worse are the artistillas of three to the room above you want to call the world of Culture! ha! Here we have sucked culture books and true to form we are now having to seek work abroad because our country offers us nothing .... # 6
22.Ene.2011 rage getting worse and why I still think that English cinema has a future and that through the good players that are coming out of the TV series. # 8 Anonymous
# 11 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 have realized that what makes a lobby of "Friends" and repeated more than garlic.
# 12 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 husks. The same goes for American cinema, which I think is the best in the world, not all films produced in that country are masterful, there is much between them snafu, I think reaching almost 60% Art should be free without subsidies or handouts. Art in all its manifestations must be creative. all original and beautiful. The film also can be. Love, Charo.
# 15 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 and other fanfare, I'm not interested in the slightest degree, in fact they in themselves do not interest me, the slightest degree, what pisses me off is that not one cent euro siquira my tax can reach these people
# 16 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 all expenses paid and happy to know. I'm afraid I still have a few years old to return to the movies (English).
22.Ene.2011 to go, "Dad eyebrows." God, that I have wanted to vote for people like this. Now you are going to collect your prize sectarianism of your hiperlegitimación absurd (in the aesthetic and even more unbelievable, as ethical) # 19 germanx
# 20 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 # 21
22.Ene.2011 are awarded each other, laugh at the same jokes, exchanged strips of all kinds in their tight costumes. If, from time to time make a good movie, even among them there is a good actor, but should reflect and be manifest as liberal as opportunists. Remember to support the strike Almodovar (Failure) General a few days ago? There was a good example, no. # 23 Anonymous
22.Ene.2011 I feel that I'm missing anything. # 24 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 subsidize films should be those that address historical facts, cultural, or showing the English idiosyncrasies. I find unattractive the idea of \u200b\u200bsubsidizing any GENERAL uninteresting subject and the Ministry of Culture is provided to release money "because." Unfortunately people who are dedicated to making films and music in this country have positioned themselves politically in too many times, always in favor of them (those who give grants, by the way) and also giving the sense that "his opinion is more qualified because they are "intellectuals?".
# 26 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 22.Ene.2011 usually clunkers, I never see (or download) films in Castilian.
# 30 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 is a real firecracker. It would be logical if you want to make your own style you do not spend much money (There are good movies with low budgets). # 32
22.Ene.2011 As English cinema, he would not go see it (and no download). # 34
22.Ene.2011 after going to tell me which one was the "bad" just for having taken the race each in a different English region. # 35 Anonymous
# 37 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 English all the spokesmen least protected from ZP and his band.
# 38 Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 Between the legs to see the angel played by Victoria Abril because the room was peeled with laughter at the nonsense dialogues. And to see the film of Coixet, that of Japan, not to understand each other anything, not even knowing that was the argument, because the interpretation of sergi lopez no sense and because it was poorly structured. Anymore. And I choose not to go see sad ballad that is boring, violent, senseless, brutal scenes come not know where to pick it up, not put up with noviaqueadelgazóaldirectoralex, and because tarantino gave the award to his buddies Alex and Sofia Coppola. Come on.
Anonymous 22.Ene.2011 # 42 Anonymous
# 44 Anonymous 23.Ene.2011 # 45
23.Ene.2011 play ... as in the case of black bread. In this life, this has been all grant rotten unions and parties, the churches, NGOs, or all or none ... # 48 Anonymous
23.Ene.2011 Anonymous 23.Ene.2011 and remember some, last week I left half a post the director, screenwriter and producer Werner Herzog German. During these days, looking about him on the internet, every time I have been discovering more and more fascinating information about this character. Some of his achievements seem almost own the great Chuck Norris . For example, Herzog was the guy who pulled to Joaquin Phoenix for his car when he suffered a serious accident. He also suffered a bullet in his belly as he gave an interview in Los Angeles and, of course, continued to respond as if nothing had happened.
The following video is my favorite, but needs some explanation. Herzog was a friend of Errol Morris, who wanted to make his first documentary film. However, Morris had no money and did not think anyone could fund your project. Herzog replied that money making movies. I had to jump to shoot, and when finished, he (Herzog) would eat one of his shoes. What seemed impossible happened: Morris finished his documentary, "Gates of Heaven " (1978), but did not yet have distribution. Herzog kept his word. Here's the video, where we see how the German director cooked, seasoned and eventually eat into the public one of your leather shoes. In that same video, Herzog talks about the accident that killed one of the dwarf of his film " Even Dwarfs Started Small " (1970), tells how to see the actor frightened by the flames, he decided to reassure all its distribution. He did assure them that if all ended well, throw (naked) to a cactus. Also fulfilled. Apparently, now, decades later, still has some thorns in the knee. I recommend reading everything you find on this type, messianic fun and, at least for me, very inspiring. There are two thoughts that have occurred to me after seeing all this material (or on) Herzog. The first: as I commented in the post last week to film "Fitzcarraldo
Is it very different Fitzcarraldo, Kinski Irish played by instructing the natives that will not loosen and come up to the boat, Herzog, German director, who, a few feet away, behind the camera, sort of the same native effort to prolong the duration of the plane that are rolling? And what these two people differ from that foreign-born tycoon, Carlos Fermín Fizcarrald , who undertook the same feat (though somewhat less absurd) centuries before? In short, to represent something, especially if one intends to do with fidelity, often must be repeated. And, of course, try to make a credible representation as possible. Get a steamer to resemble those of the time, look for an actor who may seem crazy enough to threaten someone with a machete. Maybe that's why Herzog chose to make Klaus Kinski Aguirre, Cobra Verde. I knew I could Kinski threatening someone with a machete. In fact, it was with the director. But do not lose sight that Kinski was representing a kind of alter ego of director. A much calmer director but who also came to threatening to kill her if she left the shooting star. Let the second point I wanted to talk. This cursory glance at the career of the German director has reminded me of something that from time to time I have raised. It is an idea that can get very nervous professional screenwriters. A professional managers. A professional actors. The professionals in general. We her.
Sometimes I think I overestimated the ability to interpret, to pretend or invent. Obviously, a professional and craft techniques developed to build any kind of plot, of any kind. But when it comes to writing their own, when you create something from nothing, almost always choose the same subjects, the same conflicts and similar end. Although not aware of it. As I said last week, Herzog's career is in this paradigm, but something similar happens with almost all great storytellers (writers and directors) incluso si no son autores de sus historias originales. Su intervención, aunque sólo sea en la elección del material original o en la manera de abordarlo, suele poner el énfasis en los temas que les son más cercanos, encaminando así el relato en la misma dirección que el resto de su obra. ¿A alguien que no fuera Howard Hawks se le hubiera ocurrido resolver el varonil conflicto entre John Wayne y Montgomery Clift gracias a la intervención de una mujer ingeniosa y vivaracha que casi parece recién salida de “La fiera de mi niña”? Los guionistas solemos fantasear con la idea de que podemos escribir cualquier cosa; una comedia, un drama, un thriller y una historia con monos de ojos rojos que brillan in the dark. A week positive success stories and the next, plays a hopeless own Haneke with a hangover. And of course we can do it if we paid for it. But ... what we do well? I think that when you sit down and write for pleasure, if done with some honesty, often tend to always write a variation of the same story. And in the best case, this will seem a little history of his own life. At least, which he believes is the story of his own life. Sometimes I find it ridiculous how some actors try "not to be typecast." A handsome actor is a person pretty bland and tasteless. An ugly but funny actress is a person ugly but funny. The camera will detect both, however good the script. The best actors, in my opinion, has not based his career in his escape typecasting, but repeating, with nuances and variations, the characters can do better than anyone. I think that the same happens with the writers. Normally, a writer with a sense of well-written humor funny stuff. A brainy and dense type dense and brainy write stories. Of course, a hot writer may try to write something in the style of the Dardenne brothers (and I will say this from experience), but forced it worth it, try to be someone else? Does anyone remember the films that Bergman wanted to be Woody Allen? Or which Truffaut filmed "to Hitchcock? Is not it more useful to devote the time to find who we are, what makes us different from others, what our history and how we tell it? Herzog found hers and has been giving us, over the years, in different modules. That has not prevented him address all types of genres: thriller, fantasy, period drama, contemporary realistic fiction and documentaries. As I wrote above, I know that many colleagues will not agree with these thoughts. I also feel, and I have been able to write well any history. Now, perhaps for years, I'd settle for being able to write decent one. And I have yet to find it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment